Peach Labels
Free Tool · No Email Required

EU Digital Product Passport Readiness Checker

Ten questions on the things a textile DPP is expected to require — product data, supply-chain depth, unique identifiers and the physical carrier. You get a scored result and, more usefully, the gaps ordered by how long they take to close.

10questions
~2 minto complete
Nothingstored or sent

First, the timeline — because most sources get it wrong

What is actually in force

The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is law and creates the framework for Digital Product Passports. Textiles and apparel are named a priority group in the 2025–2030 working plan.

What is not in force is any obligation on a specific garment. That comes from a product-specific delegated act, and the textile one has not been adopted.

The realistic dates

  • Late 2026 — Commission proposal for the textiles/apparel delegated act expected.
  • Late 2026 – early 2027 — adoption expected; the working plan gives 2027 as the indicative year.
  • ~Mid-2028 — obligations typically apply around 18 months after adoption.

Why the "2026 deadline" claim spreads

2026 is when the proposal is expected, not when brands must comply. That distinction gets lost in a lot of vendor marketing, and it is worth being precise about — a compliance-literate buyer will notice.

The delegated act, not this page, will fix the final dataset, carrier, product granularity, access rights and transition period.

The checker

Answer what you can. Unanswered questions are simply left out of the score rather than counted against you.

Scope

1Do you place products on the EU market?

Includes selling direct to EU consumers, through EU retailers or distributors, or via a marketplace that ships into the EU. Non-EU brands are in scope the moment goods are placed on the EU market.

2What are you placing on the market?

Textiles and apparel are a priority group in the ESPR 2025–2030 working plan. Final product granularity is set by the delegated act.

Product data

3Can you state exact fibre composition for every product?

Phase 1 of the expected textile dataset. Percentages by weight, per component, per SKU — not a range and not 'approximately'.

4Do you know the country of manufacture for each product?

Expected in Phase 1. Where the product was made, not where your supplier is registered — those often differ.

5Do you hold chemical compliance documentation?

REACH declarations, OEKO-TEX STANDARD 100 certificates or equivalent test reports — and, critically, whether you can produce them on request.

Supply chain

6How far up your supply chain can you trace a product?

Tier 1 is who assembles it. Tier 2 is fabric and trim producers. Tier 3 is yarn and fibre. The DPP dataset reaches beyond your direct supplier.

Identifier & carrier

7Does each product carry a unique persistent identifier?

A DPP is resolved per product — and often per item, not per style. A shared style code across an entire range will not be enough on its own.

8How is that identifier physically attached?

The data carrier must stay legible for the product's useful life. This is where most brands are least prepared — a hangtag is discarded at first wear.

Digital record

9Where does the identifier resolve to?

The record must remain reachable for the product's lifetime — years after sale, and after the product is resold. A marketing URL that changes at the next site rebuild breaks every garment already sold.

10Who owns DPP readiness inside your business?

The most common reason programmes stall is that this data sits across design, sourcing, compliance and IT with nobody accountable for assembling it.

The carrier is the part you cannot retrofit

Data can be fixed later. Product in market cannot.

Fibre composition and supplier records can be corrected in a database at any point. A garment already sold carries whatever you printed on it — if the identifier is on a hangtag the customer binned, the passport is unreachable for the life of that product.

Why labels are the expected carrier

The carrier has to stay legible for the product's useful life, including resale. A care label that survives fifty washes clears that bar; a swing ticket does not. That is why woven and printed labels are the carrier apparel is converging on.

QR sizing is a real constraint

A scannable woven QR code needs enough physical area and weave resolution to resolve reliably. It is worth checking against minimum line thickness before committing a design, rather than discovering it at proof stage.

Decide the URL before the first label

Every garment points at whatever you weave into it. The resolver pattern should be treated as permanent infrastructure — not a marketing URL that changes at the next site rebuild.

FAQ

Digital Product Passport, answered

Not in 2026, despite what a lot of coverage implies. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is in force, but the textiles and apparel delegated act — the thing that creates the actual obligation — has not been adopted. The Commission proposal is expected late 2026, with adoption late 2026 or early 2027, and obligations typically apply around 18 months after adoption. That puts the realistic first compliance date around mid-2028. Treat any source giving you a firm 2026 garment deadline with caution.
Yes. The obligation attaches to placing products on the EU market, not to where your company is registered. A US brand selling to EU consumers directly, through an EU retailer or distributor, or via a marketplace that ships into the EU, is in scope. If you sell exclusively within the US and Canada, it does not apply to you today.
Because the passport has to stay reachable for the product's useful life, including resale. A swing ticket is removed at first wear, which breaks the link permanently. A QR code woven into a brand label, or printed on a care label that survives washing, keeps the identifier attached to the garment for as long as the garment exists. That durability requirement is why care and brand labels are the expected carrier for apparel.
No, and it cannot be. The delegated act that fixes the final dataset, data carrier, product granularity, access rights and transition period has not been adopted yet. This tool scores your readiness against what the framework and the published working plan indicate is coming, so you can see which gaps take longest to close. It is not legal advice and it does not certify anything.
DPP LabelsGet an Instant QuoteTalk to Us